Education for a better world – Part 2 : Counter-intuitive ideas : What makes a learner successful.

Who is SC Mak?

So what exactly is the ‘official’ definition of an autonomous learner?   There is tons of literature out there on the general and specific definitions but here’s one I find concise enough to sum it up – A self-directed learner (autonomous learner) can be summed up as someone who is highly confident of their ability to learn which enables them to study entirely on their own, acquire a set of learning which can be learned and applied in self-directed learning, take charge of  an inborn capacity which is suppressed by institutional education, take responsibility  for the methods, measures and achievements of their learning goals and is capable of recognizing their right to determine the direction of their own learning.[i]

Gary J. Confessore

Taking responsibility for our learning – making informed decisions.

These ideals seem very lofty and unattainable. However, there is a possibility it sounds that way because we are products of a “Boxed in School of Thought”.  –  So what does Prof. Confessore’s area of expertise in self-directed learning mean for parents who are looking for alternatives beyond schooling?

The theories of SDL (self-directed learning) provide a general direction that can lead to sought after answers for parents who need to have some ground to touch about the validity of learning that goes beyond traditional schooling.

There has always been a canyon that divides the inroads made in academic research and its applications in the general populace those studies are supposed to benefit. It does seem unfortunate that it takes decades before we could apply what research has discovered to benefit the development of ourselves and especially that of our children. Generations of young learners would have forgone a window of opportunity for learning.  Not only that, the core-beliefs they cultivated about themselves as learners due to ineffective teaching can further impede their own chances of later becoming a self-directed learner.

Focus on solutions : Does autonomous learning mean to get rid of the teacher and textbooks?

On an average day parents often look to teachers who together look to government policy-makers or popular trend for clues to the most sound and beneficial approaches for their children’s learning. The disenchantment is real while the optimism towards the promising results of ‘Malaysia’s next schooling experiment’ dissipates.  The sense of urgency felt by teachers and parents is compounded by a perception that the window of opportunity for learning can swing either way – be damaged by neglect or killed by over-drive.  Arguments are rife about whether less or more schoolwork and pressure is beneficial for the school-going child and are clearly illustrated in the sekolah kebangsaan – sekolah jenis kebangsaan divide.

The idea of ‘autonomizing’ learning is indeed very novel to us and on the surface it seems to fly in the face of the enormous resources and effort dedicated to curriculum design, planning and implementation. How can learning happen if the learner doesn’t accept expressed learning objectives or teaching instruction? Autonomous learning does not do away completely with teacher intervention. However, the confusion between autonomous learner and self-instructed learner would require a separate article.

Commendable efforts by a dedicated academic

How fortunate for us though to have information about the latest developments in self-directed learning distilled and delivered by the speaker who is an international leader in the field of self-directed learning.    What is also interesting to note is that the speaker has extensive research and teaching experience in the field of curriculum design and specifications as well as teacher-training.

Translating academic findings to the mass in order to manifest meaningful developments that go on to benefit the formative years of young learners seems like a protracted labor and it looks like we have had a great opportunity to induce the labor and get it going.

When it comes to learners, Prof. Confessore illustrated a distinction between two extreme groups of learners; the DDs (Dysfunctional Dependent Learners) and the DIs (Dysfunctional Independent Learners). DDs are described as learners who are so completely dependent on direct and step-by-step instruction from a learning authority that they would be completely paralyzed without very clear guidelines. These learners would be unable to neither induce meaning and learning objectives nor absorb content and message without being explicitly told.

Most Malaysian parents are aware that this is the preferred outcome for our teachers who have inherited their teaching-style without much examination and applied it by default. In plain-speak, it’s described as a ‘spoon-feeding’ method, a practice validated by punishments if students dared ask further questions or have their own interpretation of their learning.

In contrast, I am reminded of what Prof.Confessore said about one of his doctorate students’ reactions when she first went to the US.   Being Asian, she was completely aghast that students in her professor’s class were raising their hands and asking questions and challenging the validity of the information their Professor had just presented. It made me wonder whether our children would still be capable of curiosity, critical thinking, meaningful reflection and intelligent questioning after having their ‘fragile’ nature packaged and delivered through those years of mandatory schooling. If these packages (our children) arrive in undergraduate programs and slave through graduate programs ‘damaged’ in their intellectual and critical capacities, how much can tertiary education do even if parents have all the money in the world to pay for it? It’s a reality that few would get an opportunity to do graduate and post-grad studies overseas in acclaimed institutions. A majority would have to carry on with life being the only learners they knew how to be – Dysfunctional Dependent ones.

The key is Balance.

On the other extreme, Dysfunctional Independent learners were described as people who possess a high drive to learn and explore but whose sense of seeking eventually leads to dysfunctional learning consequences.

This situation can be seen in American society where crime is disproportionately represented by Black and Hispanic minority groups.  By refusing to conform to and rejecting outright the norms of being educated (based on a deeper sense of resentment or disillusionment with the circumstances they have found themselves in) they re-express this intent through aggressive behavior which often leads to them being innovative gangsters, drug-dealers and perpetrators of other forms of criminal activity.  This scenario can also be seen played out here in our streets regardless of whether they were from vernacular or kebangsaan schools. We have our version of the law-defying pirated DVD-peddlers and the death-defying Mat Rempits or less dramatically, seen in children we know are highly intelligent but utterly repulsed by the thought of schooling.  A healthy balance however is manifested in a learner who can express cognitions such as goal-orientation, conscientiousness, engaged learning and emotional intelligence in their learning.

In my opinion, the most significant message coming out from this talk is that parents are capable of beginning their journey as self-directed learners and it is this self-directedness that their children model after and eventually apply to become highly successful learners.

In an age where the playing field has been leveled by the rise of literacy around the world, the Information Revolution belongs to the self-directed learners who can swim, surf and sift through the waves of information; to know who they are, what they want and how to get it. The distinction can no longer be made between the successful learner and the autonomous learner for in a world where knowledge and information is freely available the successful learner is the one who can navigate between all that to distinguish him/herself and his/her value in society.

Despite the fact that the talk was organized by homeschooling advocates and attended by parents who have found themselves at a crossroads where mainstream schooling may no longer be an option, it is worth noting that there is no rule that states learning beyond schooling can only be done by people who have completely rejected the norms of schooling. In fact, the complete picture of homeschooling goes beyond self-directedness in a significantly more holistic approach. However, autonomous learning remains a central and important theme within the scope of homeschooling.

[i] P.Benson & P.Voller, 1997


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “Education for a better world – Part 2 : Counter-intuitive ideas : What makes a learner successful.

  1. Pingback: Today’s Students Need Leadership Training like Never Before. | English For Asians in the 21st Century

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s